This way pthread options aren't passed to the linker when linking
against shared liblzma but they are still passed when linking against
static liblzma. (Also, one never needs the include path of the
threading library to use liblzma since liblzma's API headers
don't #include <pthread.h>. But <pthread.h> tends to be in the
default include path so here this change makes no difference.)
One cannot mix target_link_libraries() calls that use the scope
(PRIVATE, PUBLIC, or INTERFACE) keyword and calls that don't use it.
The calls without the keyword are like PUBLIC except perhaps when
they aren't, or something like that... It seems best to always
specify a scope keyword as the meanings of those three keywords
at least are clear.
This shouldn't make much difference in practice as on Windows
no flags are needed anyway and unitialized variable (when threading
is disabled) expands to empty. But it's clearer this way.
Now liblzma.pc can be relocatable only if using CMake >= 3.20
but that should be OK as now we shouldn't get broken liblzma.pc
if CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR or CMAKE_INSTALL_INCLUDEDIR contain an
absolute path.
Thanks to Eli Schwartz.
This reverts commit 5d1c649ba9.
While CMAKE_INSTALL_<dir> tend to be relative paths, they don't need
to be. Thus the commit was broken. A fancier method is required.
Thanks to Eli Schwartz for the bug report and explanation.
On E2K the function compiles only due to compiler emulation but the
function is never used. It's cleaner to omit the function when it's
not needed even though it's a "static inline" function.
Thanks to Ilya Kurdyukov.
It's faster with both tiny and large buffers and doesn't require
disabling any sanitizers. With large buffers the extra speed is
from folding four 16-byte chunks in parallel.
The 32-bit x86 with MSVC reportedly still needs a workaround.
Now the simpler "__asm mov ebx, ebx" trick is enough but it
needs to be in lzma_crc64() instead of crc64_arch_optimized().
Thanks to Iouri Kharon for testing and the fix.
Thanks to Ilya Kurdyukov for testing the speed with aligned and
unaligned buffers on a few x86 processors and on E2K v6.
Thanks to Sam James for general feedback.
Fixes: https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/issues/112
Fixes: https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/issues/122
Now it refers to crc_clmul_consts_gen.c. vfold8 was renamed to mu_p
and the p no longer has the lowest bit set (it makes no difference
as the output bits it affects are ignored).
It's not enough to silence the address sanitizer. Also memory and
thread sanitizers would need to be silenced. They, at least currently,
aren't smart enough to see that the extra bytes are discarded from
the xmm registers by later instructions.
Valgrind is smarter, possibly because this kind of code isn't weird
to write in assembly. Agner Fog's optimizing_assembly.pdf even mentions
this idea of doing an aligned read and then discarding the extra
bytes. The sanitizers don't instrument assembly code but Valgrind
checks all code.
It's better to change the implementation to avoid the sanitization
attributes which also look scary in the code. (Somehow they can look
more scary than __asm__ which is implictly unsanitized.)
See also:
https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/issues/112https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/issues/122
There is no need to make a similar change in configure.ac.
With Autoconf 2.72, the deprecated macro AC_PROG_CC_C99
is an alias for AC_PROG_CC which prefers a C11 compiler.
GCC 4.2 doesn't have __builtin_bswap16() and friends so tuklib_integer.h
tries to use OS-specific byte swap methods instead. On OpenBSD those
macros are swap16/32/64 instead of bswap16/32/64 like on other *BSDs
and Darwin.
An alternative to "#ifdef __OpenBSD__" could be "#ifdef swap16" as it
is a macro. But since OpenBSD seems to be a special case under this
special case of "*BSDs and Darwin", checking for __OpenBSD__ seems
the more conservative choice now.
Thanks to Christian Weisgerber and Brad Smith who both submitted
the same patch a few hours apart.
Co-authored-by: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Co-authored-by: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Closes: https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/pull/126
The C code is from Christian Weisgerber, I merely reordered the OSes.
Then I added the build system checks without testing them.
Also thanks to Brad Smith who submitted a similar patch on GitHub
a few hours after Christian had sent his via email.
Co-authored-by: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
Closes: https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/pull/125
This way the version string gets into xzgrep and other scripts
in full and also into liblzma.pc.
For the project() command, a suffixless string is required though.
liblzma_VERSION has never existed in the repository. xz_VERSION from
the project() command was used for liblzma SOVERSION so use xz_VERSION
here too.
The wrong variable did no harm in practice as PROJECT_VERSION
was used as the fallback. It has the same value as xz_VERSION.
Fixes: 7e3493d40e
This is a mess because liblzma DLL outside Cygwin and MSYS2
is liblzma.dll instead of lzma.dll to avoid a conflict with
lzma.dll from LZMA SDK.
On Cygwin the name was "liblzma-5.dll" while "cyglzma-5.dll"
would have been correct (and match what Libtool produces).
MSYS2 likely was broken too as it uses the "msys-" prefix.
This change has no effect with MinGW-w64 because with that
the "lib" prefix was correct already.
With MSVC builds this is a small breaking change that requires developers
to adjust the library name when linking against liblzma. The liblzma.dll
name is kept as is but the import library and static library are now
lzma.lib instead of liblzma.lib. This is helpful when using pkgconf
because "pkgconf --msvc-syntax --libs liblzma" outputs "lzma.lib"
(it's converted from "-llzma" in liblzma.pc). It would be easy to
keep the liblzma.lib naming but the pkgconf compatibility seems worth
it in the long run. The lzma.lib name is compatible with MinGW-w64
too as -llzma will find also lzma.lib.
vcpkg had been patching CMakeLists.txt this way since 2022 but I
learned this only recently. The reasoning for the patch makes sense,
and while this is a small breaking change with MSVC, it seems like
a decent compromise as it keeps the DLL name the same.
2022 patch in vcpkg: 0707a17ecf/ports/liblzma/win_output_name.patch
See the discussion: https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg/pull/39024
Thanks to Vincent Torri for confirming the naming issue on Cygwin.
The ancient /bin/tr on Solaris doesn't support '\n'.
With /usr/xpg4/bin/tr it works but it might not be in PATH.
Another problem was that sed was given input that didn't have a newline
at the end. Text files must end with a newline to be portable.
Fix both problems:
- Handle multiline input within sed itself to avoid one tr invocation.
The default sed even on Solaris does understand \n.
- Use octals in tr -d. \012 works for ASCII "line feed", it's even
used as an example in the Solaris man page. But we must strip
also ASCII "carriage return" \015 and EBCDIC "next line" \025.
The EBCDIC case got handled with \n previously. Stripping \012
and \015 on EBCDIC system won't matter as those control chars
won't be present in the string in the first place.
An awk-based solution could be an alternative but it might need
special casing on Solaris to used nawk instead of awk. The changes
in this commit are smaller and should have a smaller risk for
regressions. It's also possible that version.sh will be dropped
entirely at some point.
There's no real value in doing it via commit for official GH actions. We
can keep using pinned commits for unofficial actions. It's hassle for no
gain.
Maybe going forward we can limit this further by only being paranoid
for the jobs with any access to tokens.
Solaris' GCC can't understand that our use is fine, unlike modern compilers:
```
list.c: In function 'print_totals_basic':
list.c:1191:4: error: format not a string literal, argument types not checked [-Werror=format-nonliteral]
uint64_to_str(totals.files, 0));
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
```
It's presumably because of older gettext missing format attributes.
This is with `gcc (GCC) 7.3.0`.
In the past this wasn't done before releases; the Git repository
just contained the files from the Translation Project. But this
way it is clearer when comparing release tarballs against the
Git repository. In future releases this might no longer be necessary
within a stable branch as the .po files won't change so easily anymore
when creating a tarball.
Lasse Collin
RainRat
Sam James
Christoph Junghans
Andrew Murray