It's undefined behavior. The result wasn't ever used as it occurred
in the last iteration of a loop.
Clang 17 with -fsanitize=address,undefined:
$ src/xz/xz --block-list=123
src/xz/args.c:164:12: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 1
to null pointer
Fixes: 88ccf47205
Co-authored-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
(cherry picked from commit 77c8f60547)
On LZMA_DATA_ERROR from lzma_index_buffer_decode(), *i = NULL was
already done but this adds a test for that case too.
(cherry picked from commit 575b11b0d2)
liblzma guarantees that the product of the allocation size arguments
will fit in size_t.
Putting the pre-increment in the if-statement was clearly wrong
although in practice it didn't matter here as the function is
called only a couple of times.
(cherry picked from commit 7f865577a6)
If the arguments to lzma_index_decoder() or lzma_index_buffer_decode()
were such that LZMA_PROG_ERROR was returned, the lzma_index **i
argument wasn't touched even though the API docs say that *i = NULL
is done if an error occurs. This obviously won't be done even now
if i == NULL but otherwise it is best to do it due to the wording
in the API docs.
In practice this matters very little: The problem can occur only
if the functions are called with invalid arguments, that is,
the calling application must already have a bug.
(cherry picked from commit 71eed2520e)
The API docs clearly say that if error_pos isn't NULL then *error
is always set on any error. However, it wasn't touched if str == NULL
or filters == NULL or unsupported flags were specified.
Fixes: cedeeca2ea
(cherry picked from commit 70d12dd069)
This does the previous commit with CMake.
AC_EGREP_CPP uses AC_REQUIRE so the outermost if-commands must
be changed to AS_IF to ensure that things wont break some day.
See 5a5bd7f871.
(cherry picked from commit 49324b711f)
It doesn't support the __symver__ attribute or __asm__(".symver ...").
The generic symbol versioning can still be used since it only needs
linker support.
(cherry picked from commit c273123ed0)
NVHPC compiler has several issues that make it impossible to
build liblzma:
- the compiler cannot handle unions that contain pointers that
are not the first members;
- the compiler fails to produce valid code for delta_decode if the
vectorization is enabled, which results in failed tests.
This introduces NVHPC-specific workarounds that address the issues.
(This commit was contributed under 0BSD but the author confirmed
that it is fine to backport it to the public domain branches. See
https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/pull/90#issuecomment-2100185936
and the next two messages.)
(cherry picked from commit 096bc0e3f8)
There are cases when the users want to decide themselves whether
they want to have the generic (even on GNU/Linux) or the linux
(even if we do not recommend that) symbol versioning variant.
The former might be needed to circumvent compiler issues (i.e.
the compiler does not support all features that are required
for the linux versioning), the latter might help in overriding
the assumptions made in the configure script.
(This commit was contributed under 0BSD but the author confirmed
that it is fine to backport it to the public domain branches. See
https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz/pull/90#issuecomment-2100185936
and the next two messages.)
(cherry picked from commit f56ed6fac6)
Also explicitly initialize progress_automatic to make it clear
that it can be read before message_init() sets it. Static variable
was initialized to false by default already so this is only for
clarity.
(cherry picked from commit c701a5909a)
It was added in 2017 in c2e29f06a7
but it never got into any release tarballs because it was
forgotten to be added to Makefile.am.
(cherry picked from commit dfdb60ffe9)
The initial commit 5d018dc035
in 2007 had a comment in sha256.c that the code is based on
Crypto++ Library 5.5.1. In 2009 the Authors list in sha256.c
and the AUTHORS file was updated with information that the
code had come from Crypto++ but via 7-Zip. I know I had viewed
7-Zip's SHA-256 code but back then the C code has been identical
enough with Crypto++, so I don't why I thought the author info
would need that extra step via 7-Zip for this single file.
Another error is that I had mixed sha.* and shacal2.* files
when checking for author info in Crypto++. The shacal2.* files
aren't related to liblzma's sha256.c and thus Kevin Springle's
code in Crypto++ isn't either.
(cherry picked from commit 76946dc433)
Lasse Collin
Sergey Kosukhin
Jia Tan