Update page 'Move to Approve'
							parent
							
								
									cb7f2bd881
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						da963d27fb
					
				@ -20,18 +20,33 @@ We acknowledge that the reason someone creates a PR is likely:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Therefore our responsibility is to:
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
1. Determine if there's any reason the PR **shouldn't** go through
 | 
			
		||||
    * (i.e. it's out of line with the project goals)
 | 
			
		||||
1. Determine if there's any reason the PR **shouldn't** go through:
 | 
			
		||||
    * It's out of line with the project goals
 | 
			
		||||
    * The project isn't actively maintained
 | 
			
		||||
2. Help the contributor get 80% of the way there
 | 
			
		||||
    * Determine criteria that need to be met to move forward
 | 
			
		||||
3. Make the last few changes, if needed (rename a thing, fix a space)
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 
 | 
			
		||||
## 2. Pair to Prepare
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
We'll have a channel open on Keybase and set aside some "office hours" for pairing
 | 
			
		||||
to work through PRs.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## 2. Opinions are the Burden of the Bearer
 | 
			
		||||
## 3. Opinions are the Burden of the Bearer
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## 3. Remain Politically Neutral
 | 
			
		||||
We need to clearly express broad over-archiving philosophy and values, and not sweat the small stuff.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Where possible we should be using tools that solve style issues so that they're not a concern.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Where that's not possible we shouldn't let style issues get in the way of bugfixes, new features, or
 | 
			
		||||
anything that has _real_ value to those that use the software.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
If the maintainer has a strong opinion about a variable name, style of loop, etc, it becomes their
 | 
			
		||||
responsibility to demonstrate that they care that much about it by making a follow-up PR
 | 
			
		||||
(or requesting a follow-up PR), rather than to burden the contributor with non-essential opinions.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
Iteration is better than perfection.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
## 4. Remain Politically Neutral
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
First off, we recognize that everyone has moral (and amoral) values that they feel strongly about and want to enforce among other people. This is a natural human tendency. That doesn't make mud-slinging okay, but it does make it **forgivable**.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
@ -54,7 +69,7 @@ with our values of tolerance than blocking.
 | 
			
		||||
We value **individuality** (it comes with the name).
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
This is a **safe** space to have an opinion and to express it, even if it possibly offends someone,
 | 
			
		||||
as long as you're also open to feedback and you **don't become obnoxious**.
 | 
			
		||||
as long as you're also open to feedback and you **don't become obnoxious** (and don't swear like a sailor - this is Root, not San Francisco).
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
That said, please don't preach political views or mud-sling. Incidental conversation is fine. We'll block obnoxious people.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user