liblzma guarantees that the product of the allocation size arguments
will fit in size_t.
Putting the pre-increment in the if-statement was clearly wrong
although in practice it didn't matter here as the function is
called only a couple of times.
If the arguments to lzma_index_decoder() or lzma_index_buffer_decode()
were such that LZMA_PROG_ERROR was returned, the lzma_index **i
argument wasn't touched even though the API docs say that *i = NULL
is done if an error occurs. This obviously won't be done even now
if i == NULL but otherwise it is best to do it due to the wording
in the API docs.
In practice this matters very little: The problem can occur only
if the functions are called with invalid arguments, that is,
the calling application must already have a bug.
The __builtin_bswapXX from GCC and Clang are preferred when
they are available. This can allow compilers to emit the x86 MOVBE
instruction instead of doing a load + byteswap as two instructions
(which would happen if the byteswapping is done in inline asm).
bswap16, bswap32, and bswap64 exist in system headers on *BSDs
and Darwin. #defining bswap16 on NetBSD results in a warning about
macro redefinition. It's safest to avoid this namespace conflict
completely.
No OS supported by tuklib_integer.h uses byteswapXX names and
a web search doesn't immediately find any obvious danger of
namespace conflicts. So let's try these still-pretty-short names
for the macros.
Thanks to Sam James for pointing out the compiler warning on
NetBSD 10.0.
The API docs clearly say that if error_pos isn't NULL then *error
is always set on any error. However, it wasn't touched if str == NULL
or filters == NULL or unsupported flags were specified.
Fixes: cedeeca2ea
It is logical why it cannot know for sure that the value has
to be at most 4 if it is less than 16.
The x86 filter is based on a very old LZMA SDK version. Newer
ones have quite a different implementation for the same filter.
Thanks to Sam James.
On macOS, we get:
```
signals.c: In function 'signals_init':
signals.c:76:17: error: conversion to 'sigset_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} from 'int' may change the sign of the result [-Werror=sign-conversion]
76 | sigaddset(&hooked_signals, sigs[i]);
| ^~~~~~~~~
signals.c:81:17: error: conversion to 'sigset_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} from 'int' may change the sign of the result [-Werror=sign-conversion]
81 | sigaddset(&hooked_signals, message_progress_sigs[i]);
| ^~~~~~~~~
signals.c:86:9: error: conversion to 'sigset_t' {aka 'unsigned int'} from 'int' may change the sign of the result [-Werror=sign-conversion]
86 | sigaddset(&hooked_signals, SIGTSTP);
| ^~~~~~~~~
```
We use `int` for `hooked_signals` but we can't just cast to whatever
`sigset_t` is because `sigset_t` is an opaque type. It's an unsigned int
on macOS. On macOS, `sigaddset` is implemented as a macro.
Just suppress -Wsign-conversion for `signals_init` for macOS given
there's no real nice way of fixing this.
A few lines were reordered, a few ARRAY_SIZE were changed to sizeof,
and a few uint32_t were changed to size_t. No real functional changes
were intended.
We need this for when we're passing sanitizer flags or -gdwarf-4 for Clang
with Valgrind. Just always start with -O2 if CFLAGS isn't set in the
environment and append what was passed on the command line.
Using `--trace-children=yes` has a trade-off here, as it makes
`test_scripts.sh` pretty slow when calling various non-xz utilities.
But I also feel like it's not useless to have Valgrind used there and it's
not easy to exclude Valgrind just for that one test...
I did consider using AX_VALGRIND_CHECK [0][1] but I couldn't get it working
immediately with some conditionally-built tests and I wondered if it was
worth spending time on at least while we're debating xz's future build
system situation.
[0] https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_valgrind_check.html
[1] https://tecnocode.co.uk/2014/12/23/automatically-valgrinding-code-with-ax_valgrind_check/
Lasse Collin
Sam James
Ryan Carsten Schmidt