Since GCC version 10, GCC no longer complains about simple implicit
integer conversions with Arithmetic operators.
For instance:
uint8_t a = 5;
uint32_t b = a + 5;
Give a warning on GCC 9 and earlier but this:
uint8_t a = 5;
uint32_t b = (a + 5) * 2;
Gives a warning with GCC 10+.
This tests some complicated interactions with the --suffix= option.
The suffix option must be used with --format=raw, but can optionally
be used to override the default .xz suffix.
This test also verifies some recent bugs have been correctly solved
and to hopefully avoid further regressions in the future.
Fixed a bug where test_compress_* would all fail if arm64 or armthumb
filters were enabled for compression but arm was disabled. Since the
grep tests only checked for "define HAVE_ENCODER_ARM", this would match
on HAVE_ENCODER_ARM64 or HAVE_ENCODER_ARMTHUMB.
Now the config.h feature test requires " 1" at the end to prevent the
prefix problem. have_feature() was also updated for this even though
there were known current bugs affecting it. This is just in case future
features have a similar prefix problem.
Several tests were missing calls to lzma_index_end() to clean up the
lzma_index structs. The memory leaks were discovered by using
-fsanitize=address with GCC.
test_block_header was not properly freeing the filter options between
calls to lzma_block_header_decode(). The memory leaks were discovered by
using -fsanitize=address with GCC.
Converts the existing lzma_index tests into tuktests and covers every
API function from index.h except for lzma_file_info_decoder, which can
be tested in the future.
The static global variables can be disabled if encoders and decoders
are not built. If they are not disabled and -Werror is used, it will
cause an usused warning as an error.
Explicitly casting the integer to lzma_check silences the warning.
Since such an invalid value is needed in multiple tests, a constant
INVALID_LZMA_CHECK_ID was added to tests.h.
The use of 0x1000 for lzma_block.check wasn't optimal as if
the underlying type is a char then 0x1000 will be truncated to 0.
However, in these test cases the value is ignored, thus even with
such truncation the test would have passed.
Note that assigning an unsigned int to lzma_check doesn't warn
on GNU/Linux x86-64 since the enum type is unsigned on that
platform. The enum can be signed on some other platform though
so it's best to use enumeration type lzma_check in these situations.
This only occurs in test_filter_flags when the BCJ filters are not
configured and built. In this case, ARRAY_SIZE() returns 0 and causes a
type-limits warning with the loop variable since an unsigned number will
always be >= 0.
Here are the list of the most significant issues addressed:
- Avoid using internal common.h header. It's not good to copy the
constants like this but common.h cannot be included for use outside
of liblzma. This is the quickest thing to do that could be fixed later.
- Omit the INIT_FILTER macro. Initialization should be done with just
regular designated initializers.
- Use start_offset = 257 for BCJ tests. It demonstrates that Filter
Flags encoder and decoder don't validate the options thoroughly.
257 is valid only for the x86 filter. This is a bit silly but
not a significant problem in practice because the encoder and
decoder initialization functions will catch bad alignment still.
Perhaps this should be fixed but it's not urgent and doesn't need
to be in 5.4.x.
- Various tweaks to comments such as filter id -> Filter ID
It's not needed in XZ Utils at least for now. It's good to support
it still because if such use is needed later, it wouldn't be
caught on GNU/Linux since malloc(0) from glibc returns non-NULL.
The shell parameter expansion using # and ## is not supported in
Solaris 10 Bourne shell (/bin/sh). Even though this is POSIX, it is not fully
portable, so we should avoid it.
It now tries to test as many files as easily possible.
The exit status indicates skipping if any of the files were
skipped. This way it is easy to notice if something is being
skipped when it isn't expected.
xz (but not xzdec) will normally warn about unsupported check
but since we are testing specifically such a file, it's better
to silence that warning so that it doesn't look suspicious in
test_files.sh.log.
The use of -q and -Q in xzdec is just for consistency and
doesn't affect the result at least for now.
Lasse Collin
Jia Tan
Kian-Meng Ang
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos